[##]-year-old [male/female] with history and exam consistent with Ellis
type [I/II/III] fracture of the [specify tooth].
Initial considerations in
this patient included anterior and dental fracture, subluxation, and avulsion,
and various dental infections among others.
Patient presented with
description of [describe trauma] and evidence of fracture to the [specify
tooth] on exam. Patient noted to have an
Ellis [I (fracture through enamel only)/II (fracture through enamel and
dentin)/III (fracture through enamel, dentin, and pulp)] on exam with the
fractured fragment [lost at the scene of injury/in possession of the patient/reportedly
swallowed by the patient]. No evidence
of significant foreign body aspiration noted on exam. Remaining tooth noted to be [slightly mobile/without
evidence of significant subluxation or dislocation]. Patient noted to have [no other significant
injuries/abrasions to the describe location].
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteThis MDM breakdown for Ellis fractures is incredibly useful, especially the distinction between dentin and pulp involvement. When a fracture reaches the pulp, saving the tooth becomes a challenge. In those cases, exploring options like dental implants queens ny is often the most reliable way to restore both function and aesthetics for the patient.
ReplyDelete